NGOs call upon the UK Home Secretary to stop expansion of Facial Recognition Technology

staff — Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:24:18 +0000

Target Profile

Government

Audiences and Purpose

General purpose news for news-seeking audience

Generalised audience education for inspiration

Influence key stakeholders

Change

We demand change and litigate

Content

Advocacy

Summary

PI and Big Brother Watch along with other NGOs have written to UK Home Secretary James Cleverly to raise concerns over the danger posed to society by Facial Recognition Technology (FRT).

Media

Screenshot 2024-01-26 at 10.40.35.png

Privacy International (PI), Big Brother Watch (BBW), StopWatch, CopWatch, Defend Digital Me, Liberty and Statewatch have written to Home Secretary James Cleverly to raise concerns over the danger posed to UK society by Facial Recognition Technology (FRT).

In a letter sent on 18 January 2024, the signatories raised concerns over the escalating use of FRT and warned the Home Secretary that "The indiscriminate use of this dystopian biometric technology to identify people in public spaces is a form of mass surveillance [...] happening in a democratic vacuum, without specific legislation to restrict its use".

We called on the Home Secretary to "put an immediate end to the radical expansion of the use of FRT in order to protect the fundamental freedoms of all members of UK society".

You can raise your voice against the rise of FRT in the UK too by joining PI's campaign and asking your MP how this technology is being used in your local area: TAKE ACTION NOW TO STOP THE END OF PRIVACY IN PUBLIC.

Read our letter in full below and download the original copy:

18 January 2024

Dear Mr Cleverly,

Re: The danger posed to UK society by Facial Recognition Technology

We are writing to you, as organisations who campaign to defend privacy and freedom of expression in the UK, in light of the UK government's rapid expansion of facial recognition technology (FRT) throughout public spaces in the UK and the threats that this poses to society.[1]
We are alarmed by recent statements from the Home Office endorsing an expansion in the use of live facial recognition surveillance technology in both the public and private sectors. It is also deeply concerning that at least 45 UK territorial police forces have been confirmed as using retrospective FRT, despite previous police denials to this effect.[2] Private companies have also been rolling out this surveillance technology within retail spaces unchecked.[3] Now, plans to allow UK police forces access the UK’s passport database to enhance their use of facial recognition systems have been revealed.[4] These developments pose serious threats to fundamental human rights, particularly the right to privacy.
The indiscriminate use of this dystopian biometric technology to identify people in public spaces is a form of mass surveillance often carried out without individual’s knowledge or consent. Credible international studies have repeatedly found FRT systems have algorithmic biases and issues with inaccuracies which can misidentify people; particularly women, black people and people from other ethnic minorities.[5]
This is all happening within a democratic vacuum without specific legislation to restrict its use and provide sufficient safeguards against such risks, which fails to satisfy international human rights standards. Instead, police forces and the private sector continue to wrongly justify their use of FRT through a patchwork of legislation including common law policing powers and data protection legislation, which fails to adequately address the use of the technology.[6]
Furthermore, the expansion of FRT puts the UK out of step with the rest of the democratic world. Recently Members of the European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of placing a full ban on the use of live FRT in public spaces and the EU’s AI Act introduces significant restrictions on its use.[7] Bans have also been introdu ced in numerous US states[8], with Vice President Kamala Harris singling out the risk FRT poses to the public ahead of the UK’s recent AI Safety Summit.[9]
Recently, over 65 UK parliamentarians called for an “immediate stop” to the use of live facial recognition in public spaces in the UK, citing concerns over a lack of legal basis, poor accuracy and bias, and risks to privacy and freedom of expression.[10] Additionally, over 47,000 people have called on the Met Police to stop their use of live facial recognition surveillance.[11]
Furthermore, a YouGov survey conducted in June 2023 indicates there is a concerning lack of knowledge regarding whether FRT is currently deployed in constituencies across the UK.[12] In response, Privacy International’s campaign 'The End of Privacy in Public' aims to gather more information on this matter by encouraging members of the public to use their constituent power and write to demand their MP find out if facial recognition cameras are being deployed in their local area.[13] There must be more publicly available information on how FRT is being deployed.
We are calling on you as Home Secretary to put an immediate end to this radical expansion of the use of FRT in order protect the fundamental freedoms of all members of UK society. Such highly intrusive technologies must be subject the strong, legally enforceable safeguards, and where necessary, outright bans. To this end, we politely request a meeting with your Office at your next earliest convenience to discuss these concerns in more detail.

Yours sincerely,

Gus Hosein, Privacy International
Silkie Carlo, Big Brother Watch
Habib Kadiri, StopWatch
Camden CopWatch
Jen Persson, Defend Digital Me
Sam Grant, Advocacy Director, Liberty
Chris Jones, Statewatch

[1] Thompson, F., “Government looking to expand use of facial recognition technology”, The Independent, 31 August 2023. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-home-office-ministry-of-defence-chris-philp-mod-b2402785.html
[2] Wilding, M., and Milmo, C., “Police chiefs claim retrospective facial recognition searches show ‘immense potential’. But campaigners say databases contain ‘hundreds of thousands’ of innocent individuals”, Liberty Investigates and the i, 25 September 2023, https://libertyinvestigates.org.uk/articles/hundreds-of-thousands-of-innocent-people-on-police-databases-as-forces-expand-use-of-facial-recognition-tech/
[3] Townsend, M., “Major UK retailers urged to quit ‘authoritarian’ police facial recognition strategy, The Guardian”, 28 October 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/oct/28/major-uk-retailers-urged-to-quit-authoritarian-police-facial-recognition-strategy
[4] Klovig Skelton, S., https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366554287/Policing-minister-wants-to-use-UK-passport-data-in-facial-recognition, Computer Weekly, 5 October 2023, https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366554287/Policing-minister-wants-to-use-UK-passport-data-in-facial-recognition
[5] Bhuiyan, J., “First man wrongfully arrested because of facial recognition testifies as California weighs new bills”, The Guardian, 27 April 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/27/california-police-facial-recognition-software; Collins, T., “Facing gender bias in facial recognition technology”, Help Net Security, 27 August 2020, ; https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2020/08/27/facial-recognition-bias/; Kasmir, H., “Another Arrest, and Jail Time, Due to a Bad Facial Recognition Match”, The New York Times, 6 January 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/29/technology/facial-recognition-misidentify-jail.html
[6] Privacy International, “UK MPs Asleep at the Wheel as Facial Recognition Technology Spells the End of Privacy in Public”, 7 November 2023, https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5155/uk-mps-asleep-wheel-facial-recognition-technology-spells-end-privacy-public
[7] Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts, COM/2021/206 final. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
[8] Sheard, N., and Schwartz, A., “The Movement to Ban Government Use of Face Recognition”, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 5 May 2022, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/05/movement-ban-government-use-face-recognition
[9] Wintour, P., “Kamala Harris to call for urgent action on AI threat to democracy and privacy”, The Guardian, 1 November 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/01/kamala-harris-to-call-for-urgent-action-on-ai-threat-to-democracy-and-privacy
[10] Big Brother Watch, “65 parliamentarians call for “immediate stop” to live facial recognition surveillance”, 6 October 2023, https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/2023/10/65-parliamentarians-call-for-immediate-stop-to-live-facial-recognition-surveillance/
[11] See: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-met-police-using-facial-recognition-surveillance
[12] Privacy International, “UK MPs Asleep at the Wheel as Facial Recognition Technology Spells the End of Privacy in Public”, 7 November 2023, https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/5155/uk-mps-asleep-wheel-facial-recognition-technology-spells-end-privacy-public
[13] See: https://privacyinternational.org/campaigns/end-privacy-public

More about our partner

Statewatch

Statewatch is a non-profit-making voluntary group founded in 1991 to monitor the development of the EU state and civil liberties. It is comprised of lawyers, academics, journalists, researchers and community activists. Its European network of contributors is drawn from 18 countries. Statewatch encourages the publication of investigative journalism and critical research in Europe the fields of the state, justice and home affairs, civil liberties, accountability and openness.

One of Statewatch's primary purposes is to provide a service for civil society to encourage informed discussion and debate - through the provision of news, features and analyses backed up by full-text documentation so that people can access for themselves primary sources and come to their own conclusions.

Country of Operation

United Kingdom

Region of Operation

Europe

Website

Statewatch

Target Stakeholders

Our campaign

We’re facing the end of privacy in public, because of the unchecked rise of facial recognition technology (FRT) in public spaces, shops and bars. If you're in the UK, join ‘The End of Privacy in Public’ campaign to demand that your MP finds out if facial recognition cameras are being deployed in your local area.

TAKE ACTION TO STOP THE END OF PRIVACY IN PUBLIC

The UK is sleepwalking towards the end of privacy in public. The spread of insidious Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) in public spaces across the country will mean we can no longer walk down our local highstreets without being subject to constant monitoring and identification by dystopian surveillance technology.

FRT is an extremely intrusive surveillance technology which uses video cameras in public spaces to harvest sensitive biometric data in the form of facial images from everybody who passes, identifying us and running our data against watchlists. This happens without our knowledge or consent in places like High Streets and supermarkets.

What makes this dystopian future even more disturbing is that there’s no meaningful control over who can use this pernicious technology, and how. Police forces and private companies across the UK are rolling out FRT at an alarming rate and in a legislative vacuum, since no specific law exists to restrict its use. Unchecked and indiscriminate mass surveillance will inevitably follow.

Concerned by the threat that the rise of FRT in public spaces poses to UK society, Privacy International conducted a survey of over 100 MPs which reveals that most don’t even know if it’s being used in their own constituency, and don’t understand how it undermines our human rights.

Read the results of our original research to understand more about what FRT is, how it is being used in the UK and what the implications of our findings are for the end of privacy in public: “MPs Asleep at the Wheel as Facial Recognition Technology Spells The End of Privacy in Public”.

70% of MPs don’t know whether facial recognition is being used in their own constituency
Well over half (56%) of MPs either don’t know whether there is an FRT law, or wrongly think there is one! To be clear, there definitely isn’t!

Our research shows that politicians are ill-informed and complacent about this technology despite the serious threat it poses to our fundamental human rights, including the right to privacy, the right to peaceful assembly and the right to freedom of expression.

Read our original research to find out more and TAKE ACTION by joining our campaign to stop the end of privacy in public, and demand that your MP finds out if facial recognition cameras are being deployed in your local area.

Theory of Change

Off

Learn more

Intrusive surveillance technology is increasingly used during protests around the world having a chilling effect to their freedom of assembly and association.

Unique data, generated from characteristics of humans, may be used to track and profile people across their lives.

Facial Recognition is a technology that matches captured images with other facial images held, for example, in databases or "watchlists". It is an extremely intrusive form of surveillance and can seriously undermine our freedoms and eventually our society as a whole.

Mass surveillance can subject a population or significant component thereof to indiscriminate monitoring, involving a systematic interference with people’s right to privacy and all the rights that privacy enables, including the freedom to express yourself and to protest.

Our fight

Contesting Government Data and System Exploitation

The unprecedented surveillance capabilities of governments outstrip the safeguards for our rights. Governments are innovating on how to expand exploitation.

Defending Democracy and Dissent

The seamless way we communicate using some of these technologies has helped many to organise politically and to express dissent online and offline. But the hidden data harvesting on which many of these technologies rely also threatens our ability to challenge power, no matter the type of government.

Protecting Civic Spaces

Imagine that every time you want to attend a march, religious event, political meeting, protest, or public rally, you must share deeply personal information with police and intelligence agencies, even when they have no reason to suspect you of wrongdoing.

Travel surveillance in the EU

staff — Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:20:59 +0000

Explainer