PI's contribution to the first public consultation for an International Pandemic Treaty
Privacy International delivered oral and witness statement to first WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body consultation for an International Pandemic Treaty.
- The drafting and negotiations process of a new international instrument must provide for full, meaningful and effective participation of civil society organizations.
- Any future international instrument must demand the respect and protection of human rights and provide for accountability and effective remedies.
As part of the first public consultation with the WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body to draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, Privacy International delivered the following statement:
In line with WHO's commitment to a human rights-based approach to health, Privacy International believes the following elements procedural and substantive elements must be included:
Open, inclusive and multi-stakeholder process
The drafting and negotiation process of this international instrument must allow for the meaningful participation of a wide range of civil society organisations (CSOs) and reflect the commitment from the WHO and Member States to receive and respond to CSOs recommendations.
There is an abundance of expertise and knowledge across CSOs including advocates for the right to health, social justice and fundamental human rights like privacy. This wealth of information would enrich the drafting process and should serve as the foundation for understanding what this new international instrument should endeavour to achieve but also what it should aim to prevent and avoid in any future pandemic response.
Respect, enforce and protect human rights
The response to the Covid-19 pandemic has shown that the lack of clear principles and effective enforcement of existing human rights obligations of governments and private entities can lead to short-sighted decision-making with little consideration of what is needed for an effective public health response and limited understanding of the impact on individuals and communities, in particular those in vulnerable positions. In particular we have documented the exploitation of people's data and a rush to introduce various privacy-invasive technologies without human rights due diligence and safeguards. Any future international instrument must demand the respect and protection of human rights and provide for accountability and effective remedies.
- World Health Organisation, "Human rights and health", 2017
- Timothy Fish Hodgson, Roojin Habibi, Benjamin Mason Meier, Sharifah Sekalala, Ian Seiderman, Tomaso Falchetta, Thomas Schwarz, Letta Tayler, Sean Tait, Gerald Staberock, and Sara (Meg) Davis, "Human Rights Must Guide a Pandemic Treaty", Health and Human Rights Journal, 20 November 2021,
- Privacy International, "Fighting the Global Covid-19 Power-Grab: Global tracker"
- Privacy Internationa, "Covid-19 response: Corporate Exploitation"
- International Commission of Jurisists, “Civil Society Alliance for Human Rights in the Pandemic Treaty warns World Health Organization of risk of inadequate consultation”, 12 April 2022
- Privacy International, “Fighting the Global Covid-19 Power-Grab: Global tracker – Migration and Covid-19”
- Privacy International, “Covid-19 vaccination certificates: WHO sets minimum demands, governments must do even better” , August 2021
- Privacy International, “Digital Health: what does it mean for your rights and freedoms”, November 2021
- Privacy International, “Why we need to talk about digital health”, November 2021,