Cross Border Data Access | Privacy International

Reports and Analysis

Long Read

Compliant or complicit? Thai Government made American industry complicit in speech prosecution

Written by Eva Blum-Dumontet A recent case of lèse-majesté in Thailand (speaking ill of the monarchy) is a worrying example of how Western companies do not just work with governments that fall short of international human rights standards, but can actually facilitate abuses of human rights. Our

News

3rd September 2020

PI’s statement on the ECtHR decision in Privacy International v. UK

22nd July 2020

New Report on “The Use of Biometric Data to Identify Terrorists: Best Practice or Risky Business?"

3rd October 2019

PI response to confused governments’ confusing declaration of war and victory on encryption

13th September 2019

Privacy International Joins Call to Stop EU Militarisation

6th April 2017

Walking The Privacy Tightrope Across The Atlantic

6th October 2015

There is no Safe Harbour from U.S. Authorities

See more examples of abuse

Our Advocacy

Privacy International’s response to the European Commission’s public consultation on improving cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal matters

On 23 October 2017, Privacy International contributed to the public consultation of the European Commission on improving cross border access to electronic evidence for criminal investigation. The consultation raises important questions, particularly in relation to preserving human rights protection

View more advocacy